The Sony A7 III is the most popular full frame camera on the market, and it has been since its release. In fact, camera stores often have to back-order it. In the mirrorless segment, Sony was the only brand to offer 35mm format products until Nikon, Canon and Panasonic decided to compete in the same arena.
Among the various models now on sale, the Nikon Z6 feels like the most direct rival. The size is similar and the specs match the E-mount camera on many fronts. We were not asked to write anything about these products, nor were we provided any other compensation of any kind. Within the article, there are affiliate links. If you buy something after clicking one of these links, we will receive a small commission. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page.
Thank you! Article Updates 2. Main Specs 3. Design and functionality 4. Controls and customisation 5. Viewfinder and monitors 6. Image quality 7. Autofocus 8. Speed 9. Image stabilisation Video capabilities Flash and extra features Battery life Price and lenses Conclusion Gear used and additional links. The two cameras are not dissimilar when it comes to size and weight.
The first advantage of the Z6 is the front grip: it is taller and allows you to rest your fingers comfortably, unlike the A7 III which forces you to squeeze them tighter. Furthermore, the space between the grip and the lens barrel can be narrow with select Sony primes and zooms.
One solution is to buy an optional grip extender. The official product is very good but expensive. I also want to point out the Z6 grip is better but not the best. Both cameras are weather sealed and feature a magnesium alloy chassis. They feel robust and well built. I accidentally scratched the top part of my Z6 where the Nikon logo is.
Thread starter JonathanF2 Start date Mar 23, I also highlighted key points if you don't want read through everything! No issues whatsoever using the FTZ adapter. It's fast and works with all my F-mount lenses.
It was pretty close to my D in terms to AF acquisition. In fact the biggest complaint about AF seems to be the most overblown. Yes it's no D5 or even a D, but it's almost at D level AF performance which means it's fast for all but the most demanding of action. Nikon files just need a bit more sharpening in post to match Sony files.
I did compared images from both cameras using the same lens Sigma 35mm 1. My biggest issue though with the Z camera was the magnify view. I have about 10 or so MF Nikkors, a few M mount lenses and some M42 Russian glass I like, so having a good magnify view is important to me. I found when magnifying, there is some significant slow down which is a bit of an issue for me.
In fact this is the one area where I want to see if the upcoming firmware will fix. Since the Z settings are similar to a Nikon DSLR, you can skip every other focus point making it easier to compose your shot. Sony doesn't offer focus point skippingmaking Eye AF a bit more necessary to speed up operation in portrait shooting. For now, I'll wait out the Z until the firmware update hopefully addressing the magnify view issueCF Express is released for cheaper cards, more native lenses come flooding the used market and a holiday price reduction come end of year.
I think overall the Z6 feels just like a Nikon DSLR and if someone wants to jump into Nikon mirrorless with access to many F-mount lenses, I'd totally recommend the camera! Last edited: Mar 23, When combined with a FTZ adapter, it performs virtually as a native lens due to the new AF pulse motors Nikon is using. It's quite fast and is completely silent. Performance is highly rated and is cheaper than the Sony mm G bought new.
Though I also appreciate Sony's compact approach to FF mirrorless. One issue on the Z6 body is that people with long fingers will dig their nails into the rubber grip, causing possible wear and tear. It's highly recommended to get a half case or perhaps add an arca bracket to change the way the camera is gripped. Full screen recording with no crop. Nikon doesn't penalize you for using adapted lenses and they will focus just as a native lens would in video though depending on lens AF motor, it might cause some focus noises.
Joined Jan 25, Messages Location Australia.
Thanks for that extended assessment. As a bird shooter the Z's disappointed me when they came out, and given Nikon's failure to produce a DX system I had no confidence there'd be a mirrorless D anytime soon.Where it fails and wins. Today Nikon announced officially the new Nikon Z6 and Z7 cameras. I love many things about these new Nikons and am thrilled that Nikon finally got serious in mirrorless but lack of lenses at launch three lenses, nothing exoticbattery system and single card slot may turn some off.
I will talk more about these models soon but see my thoughts below in a new video:. I was very […]. Meet the Fringer Adapter. I talk about what I think it is, what I […]. I recently changed system to Sony, and so far completely satisfied with my decision. Just saying! Hey Steve, first congrats on your site — a very rare example of honest, balanced and representation of photography and gear. So : Sony vs Nikon? Not that easy. There, the D cannot be conquered IMO….
Recently though I also do quite some birding for which I found my example of Nikon very-very good, even with 1. First I wanted it for general lightweight FF travel camera, and I love it, but guess what, it gives great performance also for birding with the and the sony 1. I think that is quite a compliment for Sony, mostly due to its awesome AF. But the few real top photos are from the Nikon gear although rare — all due to reach and cropping potential of the D exceptional high res sensor.
Cannot wait to see how this turns out — I prefer to keep only one system and need to stop or slow down burning money on this :.
Any opinions on this?
Nikon Z6 vs. Panasonic S1 vs. Sony a7 III, which is right for you?
If I had more Nikon glass I would probably go to the Z series, as that seems to be why they made it, for existing Nikon users who have a glass collection. You have 12 lenses so the Z seems natural.
Nikon is going to release a battery grip for the Z so that will solve any battery issues. Steve, just to clarify the grip issue, they are releasing a grip, but all the specs available online say there is no electronic connection in the base of the camera, so no shutter release or back button autofocus for this grip. Is this another design failure? For me it was just another tick in the deficit column.
Yep, a grip is coming but you are correct. No contacts and no shutter release. I lost all interest in the Z series and almost lost all interest in the Canon after speaking behind closed doors with over 7 who have shot with it. Of course both Nikon and Canon wont have the native lens lineup that Sony has built up plus Sony has some stellar manual lenses from the likes of Zeiss and Voigtlander so Sony could still win for now in terms of the more complete system. Would they continue to compromise this on their mirrorless cameras?
If they offer a flip screen in their next update and continue to improve on the battery performance and colour profiles, it could be a winner for video. Panasonic seem to be leading the way for video in this regard but their cameras are only mBoth Nikon and Canon have significantly updated their cameras since this article was written.
We conducted a new comparison in Aprilwhich reflects the current situation. Click here to read our updated in-depth comparison. Sony had the full-frame mirrorless market to itself for nearly five years. And, while it's been doing clever and interesting things with the likes of the a9, it's the more basic a7 models that have had the most impact. The original a7 was the least-expensive full-frame camera yet launched, which helped make the format look more accessible than it had been since the film era.
But in most respects, these cameras are direct competitors. Before going any further, we should make clear that they're all good cameras most modern cameras arethey're all very well built and can all take great photos, so don't listen to anyone who says any one of them is terrible. However, there are practical differences, so we're going to look at what each offers in different shooting situations.
And they ask why we complain about dpr being too much in favor of sony, this article should be updated as many things evolved with the Z6. In fairness, it's difficult enough to re-test cameras in the light of major firmware updates, let alone having to go back to find and re-work every article that made a comparison to them. As it happens, we wrote an updated piece that supersedes this one. I've put in a link to that piece, which reflects the improvements made to both the Nikon and the Canon since in the 18 months since this was published.
All I want to know is which one of the three plays nicest with adapted vintage manual lenses? I am curious about focus assist options and such It is a good time to update this article for shopping season with all the firmware updates each camera has received.
The new Nikon Z6 vs the Sony A7III. Where it fails and wins.
This is like a Sergio Leone film. This good review missed the use case of shooting with old classic lenses. These new Mirrorless bodies all have great potential for those of us who shoot with old Leica, Zeiss, Canon, Nikon and other glass. I also recognize that someone shooting only new AF glass that cares a lot about sports and fashion would get a very different answer.
Half my lenses are legacy mF but to be honest you don't need anything more than 16mp or 12mp to bring out the best of old film lenses. So the A7R3 and Z7 are way overkill. An A would be sufficient if you like the 1. An A7Sii would be an interesting option.
I agree that a better EVF does make a difference in this use case but that may be due to older eyes. Techart Pro. You can AF nearly every lens ever made that has a flange distance equal to or longer than Leica M mount. All the resolution in the world goes out the door if you're a hair out of focus from manually focusing.Update: the article now includes a summary of our complete comparison.
Scroll down to check it out and to visit the full article! Sony has become a reference on both the mirrorless market and the digital camera market as a whole thanks to the rise of the A7 series. Just recently the company became number one on the US full-frame market, which is a clear sign that the DSLR competition is falling behind. Sony was also the only mirrorless brand to embrace the 35mm format up until now, if we exclude Leica whose SL and M systems are much more of a niche segment.
But first, a quick list of what the two cameras have in common:. Ethics statement : the following is based on our hands-on experience with the Nikon Z6 and our long-term experience with the A7 III that we currently own. A complete comparison with the two cameras is now available here. We were not asked to write anything about these products, nor were we provided any other compensation of any kind.
All opinions we express regarding these products are our own. Within the article, there are affiliate links. If you buy something after clicking one of these links, we will receive a small commission. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page.
Sony a7 III vs. Canon EOS R vs. Nikon Z6, which is best?
Thank you! In fact the new super-sized Z mount is the primary reason Nikon decided to produce a new mirrorless system in the first place. The flange distance sensor to mounting flange is 2mm shorter on the Z camera as well 16mm vs 18mm. My guess is that it will vary from lens to lens and each individual optical design. If Nikon is increasing its know-how on how to design smaller lenses without impacting the quality, then the Z system may certainly become very interesting indeed.
The Z system debuted with three lenses, which is a better start in terms of versatility than what Sony managed in The Noct 0. Sony has worked hard on its lens line-up over the past five years so logically it has the advantage of a more complete catalogue of native lenses, as well as support from third-party manufacturers such as Zeiss, Samyang, Tamron and Sigma.
As for the native optics, Nikon will obviously require a few years to build an acceptable range. For now, the optional FTZ adapter will give you full compatibility with 93 Nikkor lenses or more than with partial functionality. The adapter left me with a positive impression. The Z6 is reactive and fast at locking onto the subject with very little hesitation or back and forth movements.
Nikon has proved this theory right. The Z6 is not a lot larger than the A7 mark III, yet by adding a bulkier and larger front grip, your hand and fingers rest much more comfortably.Both Nikon has significantly updated the Z6's capabilities since this article was written.
We conducted a new comparison in Aprilwhich reflects the current situation. Click here to read our updated in-depth comparison. A significant group of camera makers have decided that full frame mirrorless cameras are the sector most likely to remain profitable as the camera market contracts.
The other potential contender here is the Canon EOS R but, while its lens lineup is looking interesting, we think the other three cameras are stronger contenders, so will concentrate on those for now.
When it comes to their sensors, similarities go way beyond just the headline pixel count. Performance is so close across the trio that you might reasonably conclude that they had similar underlying silicon. There are differences, of course: Panasonic hasn't topped its chip with phase detection AF masks, which reduces the already small risk of striping artifacts at the cost of slightly lower continuous AF performance. Meanwhile Sony restricts you either to lossy Raw compression that can slightly limit your processing flexibility, or honking-great uncompressed files.
But in terms of your images, lenses are likely to make much more difference to your photos than the brand name that appears on the front of the camera. Maybe they fix that in an update, maybe they don't And since I just got a bargain 2nd hand S1 body, I was more than happy to order up a few cheap adapters for pocket change before having to shell out thousands for the zooms. For me that leaves the Sony out.
It's not fun to shoot with. I'd be a bit worried about the Panasonic's longevity and it's BIG. I agree, the Z6 looks like great eronomics, weight and UX. I'd choose the Sony last on the basis of UX alone. I think the Sony would be my second choice, but I've yet to try the Panasonic. The Sony is an outstanding camera and the interface is workable. The handling is poor, but that's what happens with smaller cameras.
What Sony lacks most compared to Canon and Nikon is promotion, the local camera store up to only recently promoted Canon and Nikon as "the" choice for serious photographers.
Sony now has a small presence, Panasonic none at all. This is also reflected in the magazine rack at the local Newsagent. This is true but I would guess that a surprisingly small percentage of buyers have access to camera stores with an adequate selection and an even smaller percentage read magazines. Sony has a presence online where it matters and where it will matter even more going forward. I think Sony realized this a few years ago and stopped trying to keep up with the Canon and Nikon marketing and distribution machines.
It just doesn't matter much these days whether Costco or Target or a few camera stores in larger metros carry your product.I had done enough research to be dangerous and overwhelmed. Jelena did a great job assimilating my desires and her knowledge of the area and planned the trip around our interests. All suggestions she made were spot on and contributed to the success of the trip. There were a few minor hiccups but nothing that couldn't be worked around.
Contact with Nordic while in country was always handled quickly and in a professional manner. It was nice having the peace of mind knowing Nordic had our backs. We had a wonderful time. I would go again in a heartbeat. I felt safe and knew I was expected at certain locations at certain times, so I could move at my own pace in between. The scenery was breathtaking and I felt so lucky that I could take my time really enjoying that. Every person we encountered was polite, dedicated and professional.
Every excursion and hotel was great. I highly recommend going to Iceland and using Nordic Visitor when you get there.
Nikon Z6 vs Sony A7 III – The 10 Main Differences
We felt that every aspect of our contact with you was professional and excellent and are very pleased we chose to book through you. There were no complications, errors, annoyances. We had a marvelous time in the three beautiful capital cities and loved every moment of our travels in them. We were especially impressed by the friendliness, courtesy and exemplary English spoken. We had an excellent holiday although it was a shame that we didn't see the Northern lights.
Purely down to the weather though. Overall the communication and planning of the holiday went very smoothly and everywhere we went we were treated very well. The chosen accommodation was, in all cases, superb. However, my advisor re-arranged my schedule and accommodation. A big help in such unforeseen situation. I travel alone throughout the world. By far this is the most seamless and professional group with whom I have ever dealt with. I can't say enough about her - she was patient, and friendly and made the tour memorable.
I cannot say enough about our service I received from your company. The attention to detail was wonderful not only from your company but the service providers you use was wonderful.
It made me feel so incredibly special. We enjoyed most parts of the trip and wish we had more time to stay longer. Bergen and Tromso were our favourite especially our Aurora Hunting Tour with Marcus, absolutely spot on.
Overall, we had an amazing experience in Norway, couldn't ask for more.